EC[ON]OMY

Lessons from Kazakhstan’s 1990s economic challenges

The mistakes made in the early years after the collapse of the Soviet Union continue to shape Kazakhstan’s economy today. In my view, several major missteps defined that turbulent period:

1.⁠ ⁠Delayed Exit from the Ruble Zone

One of the biggest mistakes was Kazakhstan’s excessive reliance on Moscow and the late decision to leave the ruble zone. Interestingly, it was actually Kazakhstan’s leadership that initially proposed keeping a common ruble area, but Moscow rejected the idea – a decision it may later have regretted.

Kazakhstan became one of the last former Soviet republics to abandon the ruble. As a result, the country lost control over its monetary policy and faced a chaotic money system. With economic ties to other republics suddenly broken and no clear national strategy, Kazakhstan plunged into hyperinflation:

  • ⁠ ⁠In 1992, food prices rose by 30 times,
  • ⁠ ⁠In 1993, they rose by another 23 times.

By 1994, inflation had reached an astonishing 1,300%, wiping out people’s savings and forcing many to rely on barter instead of cash. GDP fell by about 25% compared to 1991.

Meanwhile, the financial system was in crisis. Around 230 commercial banks existed in 1993, but few had access to real credit resources. Government oversight was weak, and most banks operated using household deposits – many of them eventually went bankrupt.

2.⁠ ⁠Privatization Turned into “Grab-itization”

The second systemic failure was the poorly designed and non-transparent privatization process. Officially, it was meant to create an efficient market economy and attract investors. In reality, it became a chaotic process of “grab-itization.”

The voucher-based privatization program did not lead to fair ownership distribution or the creation of capable private owners. Instead, a small group of intermediaries and early entrepreneurs gained enormous profits by reselling assets abroad at much higher prices.

At the same time, corruption and the shadow economy expanded rapidly – about 30% of the economy operated unofficially.

As a result, privatization failed to create a competitive environment. It deepened social inequality and destroyed public trust in the very idea of reform.

3.⁠ ⁠Loss of National Assets and Transfer of Soviet Property to Russia

A third critical mistake was the lack of control over the country’s physical assets. In the early years of independence, Kazakhstan lost valuable state property – including military aircraft, industrial equipment, and other strategic assets – through theft or mismanagement.

A further blow came when former Soviet republics agreed to let Russia take over all the USSR’s debts and foreign assets. As a result, Russia assumed about $63 billion of the Soviet Union’s $97 billion total debt – but in return, it received the USSR’s overseas assets and claims on foreign countries worth around $150 billion.

Kazakhstan’s experience in the “wild 1990s” offers several crucial lessons for the future:

  • ⁠ ⁠Long-term planning must become a core principle of economic policy. Reforms should follow a consistent strategy, and leaders must be personally accountable for results – not only politically, but also legally.
  • ⁠ ⁠Any major economic reform should be irreversible – only then will society view it as fair and stable.
  • ⁠ ⁠The government must maintain a balance between macroeconomic stability and social protection of citizens.
  • ⁠ ⁠Regional development needs special attention. Economic initiative should shift to the regional level, allowing local authorities to grow their own tax base and business activity.

The loss of a “culture of earning and initiative” is a direct result of over-centralization and lack of local motivation.

Yerlan Karimov, independent expert, specifically for www.economyKZ.org

Scroll to Top

Discover more from EC[ON]OMY

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading